Search for: All records

We undertook Zr isotope measurements on zircon, titanite, biotite, amphibole, and whole rocks from the La Posta pluton (Peninsular Ranges, southern California) together with trace element analyses and U-Pb age measurements to understand the controls on Zr isotope fractionation in igneous rocks, including temperature, crystallization sequence, and kinetic effects. We find large (>0.6‰) Zr isotope fractionations (expressed as δ94/90Zr) between titanite and zircon forming at approximately the same temperature. Using equilibrium fractionation factors calculated from ionic and ab initio models, we infer the controls on Zr isotope evolution to include the relative order in which phases appear on the liquidus, with titanite fractionation resulting in isotopically lighter melt and zircon fractionation resulting in isotopically heavier melt. While these models of Zr fractionation can explain δ94/90Zr variations in zircon of up to ∼1.5‰, crystallization order, temperature and presence of co-crystallizing phases do not explain all aspects of the intracrystalline Zr isotopic distribution in zircons in the La Posta pluton or the large range of Zr isotopic values among zircons (>2‰). Without additional constraints, such as knowledge of co-crystallizing phases and a better understand of the true causes of Zr isotope fractionation, Zr isotopes in zircon remains an ambiguous proxy of magmatic evolution. 

Abstract U-Pb geochronology by isotope dilution–thermal ionization mass spectrometry (ID-TIMS) has the potential to be the most precise and accurate of the deep time chronometers, especially when applied to high-U minerals such as zircon. Continued analytical improvements have made this technique capable of regularly achieving better than 0.1% precision and accuracy of dates from commonly occurring high-U minerals across a wide range of geological ages and settings. To help maximize the long-term utility of published results, we present and discuss some recommendations for reporting ID-TIMS U-Pb geochronological data and associated metadata in accordance with accepted principles of data management. Further, given that the accuracy of reported ages typically depends on the interpretation applied to a set of individual dates, we discuss strategies for data interpretation. We anticipate that this paper will serve as an instructive guide for geologists who are publishing ID-TIMS U-Pb data, for laboratories generating the data, the wider geoscience community who use such data, and also editors of journals who wish to be informed about community standards. Combined, our recommendations should increase the utility, veracity, versatility, and “half-life” of ID-TIMS U-Pb geochronological data.